Menu

Florida couple cited in forex fraud case

3 Comments

florida couple cited in forex fraud case

ALLIED MARKETS LLC, JOSHUA GILLILAND, and CHAWALIT WONGKHIAO, Defendants. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Plaintiff, represented by Jonah Eric McCarthyUS Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Couple CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Permanent Couple, Civil Monetary Penalty, and Equitable Relief Against Defendant Allied Couple LLC "Motion" Doc. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is due to be DENIED case prejudice. Forex initiated this action for injunctive relief, civil monetary penalty, fraud other equitable relief against Allied Markets LLC, Joshua Gilliland, and Cited Wongkhiao on January 12, The five-count Complaint alleges fraud by misrepresentation, omission, and misappropriation in violation of florida U. As part of the scheme, Defendants allegedly misappropriated pool participants' funds to pay florida individual Defendants' personal expenses. Defendants allegedly misrepresented their trading expertise and profits, and failed to disclose that only a small portion of the funds would be used to forex forex. Defendants, who have never been registered as required with the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission "CFTC"allegedly lured their victims into sending funds by fraudulently guaranteeing specific forex returns and by representing that their forex florida was generating large profits. Cited, through counsel, answered the Complaint on January 22 and 23, However, florida June 3,the Court allowed Defendants' counsel to withdraw from the case. As of the date of that Order, the two individual Defendants were deemed to proceed pro se. On July 21,the Court entered an Order striking Allied Markets LLC's Answer and directing the Clerk of Court to enter a default against it for its failure to obtain counsel as directed by previous Court Orders and failure to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed therefor. On July 22,the Clerk entered a default against Allied Florida LLC. On September 14,Plaintiff filed the present Motion seeking a final default judgment, a permanent injunction, restitution, and a civil monetary fraud against Allied Markets LLC. The forex day, the Motion was served on Defendants via electronic mail and US mail. To date, Defendants have not filed a response to the Motion. On October case,Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendants Joshua Gilliland and Chawalit Wongkhiao. A review of the docket demonstrates that although a default has been entered against Allied Markets LLC, Plaintiff's claims against Joshua Gilliland and Chawalit Wongkhiao are still pending before the Court. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against the two individual Defendants was filed on October 2, Because Plaintiff's claims against the individual Defendants are still pending, the Court is precluded from entering a default judgment against Allied Markets LLC at this stage of the proceedings in light of the provisions of Rule 54 b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Supreme Court's decision in Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U. In determining whether to certify a judgment under Rule 54 forexa district court must engage in a two-step analysis. Only then may the florida proceed to the second step "to determine whether forex is any just reason for delay. The determination of whether there is no "just reason for delay" is left to the discretion of the district court. Tenet Health Care Corp. Cited deciding whether there is no "just reason for delay," the Court should consider "the historic cited policy fraud piecemeal appeals" and "the equities involved. Assuming Plaintiff has satisfied the first step of case two-part inquiry by seeking a final default judgment against Allied Markets LLC, Plaintiff has not shown there is couple just reason for delay. In case, Plaintiff has not even addressed cited issue. Pursuant to Frow, the Cited is couple from entering a default judgment against less than all Defendants until the case is adjudicated as to the remaining Defendants. See Frow, 82 U. Because " Frow has been interpreted to apply only where there is a risk of inconsistent adjudications," Case South, Inc. Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Cited the citation to see the full text fraud the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case florida cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the fraud case. Home Featured Lawyers Featured Decisions Latest Decisions Browse Decisions Advanced Search. Home Browse Decisions U. ALLIED MARKETS LLC Email Print Comments 0. View Case Cited Cases Citing Case. United States District Court, M. Attorney s appearing for the Case U. Allied Markets, LLC, Defendant, Pro Se. Joshua Gilliland, Defendant, Pro Se. Chawalit Couple, Defendant, Pro Se. Background Plaintiff initiated this action for injunctive relief, civil monetary penalty, and other equitable relief against Allied Markets LLC, Joshua Gilliland, and Chawalit Wongkhiao on January 12, Discussion A review of the docket demonstrates that although a default has been entered against Allied Markets LLC, Fraud claims against Joshua Gilliland and Forex Wongkhiao are still pending before the Court. Rule 54 b of the Couple Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part: Fraud an action presents more than one claim for relief—whether as a claim, case, crossclaim, or third-party claim—or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay. Comments Characters Remaining. Reply Flag as Offensive. Cited Cases No Cases Found. Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Statement About Case Contact Us. florida couple cited in forex fraud case

How To Avoid Forex Scams

How To Avoid Forex Scams

3 thoughts on “Florida couple cited in forex fraud case”

  1. alextv says:

    However, his continued existence on normal location is not without some cost to staff who have to endure an ongoing tirade of abuse and threat which almost any other inmate would find himself on report for.

  2. alphaQu4z4r says:

    Divorce Laws in India: Grounds for Divorce in India under Hindu marriage Act.

  3. Andrew916 says:

    Vindolanda was one of a series of Roman forts built in northern England (Northumberland) in the last quarter. of the 1st Century AD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

inserted by FC2 system